Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:03:04 -0500 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil+cvs-ports@tandon.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/adime Makefile ports/x11-wm/icewm Makefile ports/graphics/scr2png Makefile ports/x11/xbindkeys Makefile Message-ID: <20120220060303.GA7722@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202182356.q1INuU7V061378@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120219060053.GA45762@FreeBSD.org> <20120219150943.GA6673@magic.hamla.org> <20120219164528.GA48166@FreeBSD.org> <20120219175645.GA6833@magic.hamla.org> <20120219191106.GA71541@FreeBSD.org> <20120219203937.GA6943@magic.hamla.org> <20120220012336.GA41983@FreeBSD.org> <20120220024754.GB7587@magic.hamla.org> <20120220041449.GA65665@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 04:14:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > ... > Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@. I was > viewing the issue from a limited angle. Doug pointed out exact > deficiency in my thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a > bummer (that is, if one wants to hold shlib dependency while being > able to chase updates of the leaf ports). Hm, I guess you missed mi@'s mention of such a scenario a few days ago, in the very same thread that I noted earlier in this discussion: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073262.html -- Sahil Tandon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120220060303.GA7722>