From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 30 21:30:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFC4933 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BAB1AEB for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAULUNgg000183; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:30:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rAULUNtb000180; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:30:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:30:23 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Mike." Subject: Re: gmirror, gpart and MBR vs GPT in the Handbook In-Reply-To: <201311301459580085.0648D9AC@smtp.24cl.home> Message-ID: References: <201311301303210813.05DE187E@smtp.24cl.home> <20131130190742.2b1d7e36.freebsd@edvax.de> <201311301459580085.0648D9AC@smtp.24cl.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:30:23 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 21:30:25 -0000 On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Mike. wrote: > On 11/30/2013 at 7:07 PM Polytropon wrote: > > |On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:03:21 -0500, Mike. wrote: > |> Is there a specific reason why MBR was used in the Handbook > |> example for creating a mirror, instead of GPT? Or was it > just > |> a preference of the person who wrote that Handbook page? > | > |Refer to this document for a demonstration which is more > |directed toward GPT: > | > |http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/gmirror.html > | > |The Handbook's mentioning of MBR, even though commands > |involved are centered around gpart (instead of the more > |traditional tools fdisk and bsdlabel) seems to suggest > |that an update might be indicated. :-) fdisk and bsdlabel are not needed, gpart does everything they can do. > Excellent, that site looks to be a very good resource. That document shows how to mirror GPT partitions, but there are definite downsides. I really should update that article. At least for now, MBR is still the way to go for mirroring a whole drive.