From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 18:17:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D4816A4CF for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB67043D54 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:17:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so116975wri for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:17:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=MiP8cxt0HZdXUS3krdvL+5E7/vzp3VMZr4EyzJ0kgOZblDvLT/yX+KBmFtuA3K8raR3L92Qh1Z2BUrjQ2vEhPnHxLvZJURQ5sUV04FkO22uzF+Lu0WDBbTyXvVKOWUOrBZ9dKQBlsirxqphT5AAteHk9SXNrHrPIQmE2YnWkIe8= Received: by 10.54.48.73 with SMTP id v73mr355219wrv; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:30:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.29.48 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:30:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <790a9fff050126083033327cf4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:30:20 -0600 From: Scot Hetzel To: Joe Zeiler In-Reply-To: <790a9fff05012608282ceb53b2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41F00880.2050506@covad.net> <41F71C20.4080002@covad.net> <790a9fff05012608282ceb53b2@mail.gmail.com> cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: webmaster@lightningfire.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: awstats-6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:17:11 -0000 On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:28:31 -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:27:12 -0600, Joe Zeiler wrote: > > Joe Zeiler wrote: > > Port Maintainer, this is a security update, all you have to do is make > > the changes I have given you, why won't you do this simple task? > > The port maintainer may be on vacation. He may also not have commit > privliges to the ports CVS repository. A better aproach would be to > use send-pr to send a problem report with the maintainer in CC and the > patch attached. > > This way one of the Ports Commiters will commit the changes if the > maintainer hasn't answered or they consider it a big enough security > risk. > Also the Port Commiter will commit the change given a rubber stamp aproval from the port maintainer. Scot