From owner-freebsd-audit  Fri Mar  2 10:20:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C612737B719
	for <audit@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Mar 2001 10:20:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f22IKGd58516;
	Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:20:16 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200103021820.f22IKGd58516@harmony.village.org>
Subject: Re: PATH_MAX vs MAXPATHLEN 
Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>, audit@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:14:02 MST."
		<200103021814.f22IE3d58463@harmony.village.org> 
References: <200103021814.f22IE3d58463@harmony.village.org>  <20010302115105.A63024@hamlet.nectar.com> <200103020206.f2226Md53114@harmony.village.org> 
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:20:16 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <200103021814.f22IE3d58463@harmony.village.org> Warner Losh writes:
: It was an off by one error yesterday too :-).

Actually, I took a look at the patch, and you are right, this is a
problem.  I've corrected the patch.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message