From owner-cvs-all Mon Dec 16 15:53:56 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE0637B404; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from cognet.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FAA43EC5; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 15:53:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doginou@cognet.ci0.org) Received: from cognet.ci0.org (cognet.ci0.org [80.65.224.102] (may be forged)) by cognet.ci0.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBGNrEOc008448; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:53:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from doginou@cognet.ci0.org) Received: (from doginou@localhost) by cognet.ci0.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBGNrDCi008447; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:53:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:53:12 +0100 From: Olivier Houchard To: Nate Lawson Cc: "Long, Scott" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20021216235312.GA8238@ci0.org> References: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CC18@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:05:20PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Long, Scott wrote: > > Most commits to HEAD do not need explicit approval from re@ at this > > time. > > Yes. What goes in GENERIC is pretty important, however, due to potential > interactions so it would be nice for such a change to not be made > hastily. The trm(4) driver has not been around long also. > I can see your point. > > I noted the same concern as you on this one, but it's not as > > critical an issue as if it had been committed to RELENG_5_0. Also, > > to my knowledge, there is nothing wrong with this particular commit. > > The release scripts need to be told about the trm driver so they > > can do the right thing with the floppy disk builds, however. > > Yes, release/${arch}/drivers.conf need to be updated. The attached patch is correct, right? I guess it fits best on the 3rd floppy. Olivier --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="drivers.conf.diff" --- /usr/src/release/i386/drivers.conf Sat Dec 7 16:16:32 2002 +++ drivers.conf Tue Dec 17 00:50:52 2002 @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ SYSVSHM sysvshm 2 options "SYSV-style s amr amr 3 disk "AMI MegaRAID" mlx mlx 3 disk "Mylex DAC-family RAID" mly mly 3 disk "Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID family" +trm trm 3 disk "Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U SCSI cards" twe twe 3 disk "3ware ATA RAID" de if_de 3 network "DEC DE435 PCI NIC or other DC21040-AA based card" --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message