Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:24:04 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: molter@tin.it Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Junior hacker test Message-ID: <20020318.092404.107005711.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <20020318103038.A9497@cobweb.example.org> References: <20020318.002201.78675743.imp@village.org> <20020318103038.A9497@cobweb.example.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020318103038.A9497@cobweb.example.org>
Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it> writes:
: On 2002-03-18, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: > Mark all the usage() functions in the tree __dead2.
:
: Hi Warner,
:
: I had a look at the source (mainly to count the occurences of usage() ;-).
:
: I have a question: since from my understanding __dead2 must be added
: to the function declaration, what about the cases where usage() is
: defined but not declared? You want to add the declaration?
I'd add it to the definition if it isn't forward declared.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020318.092404.107005711.imp>