From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep  6 16:12:49 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B0DF54;
 Fri,  6 Sep 2013 16:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0CB2BE9;
 Fri,  6 Sep 2013 16:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.179.53] (dslb-188-105-247-125.pools.arcor-ip.net
 [188.105.247.125])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EBA83F418;
 Fri,  6 Sep 2013 12:12:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r326441 - head/lang/gcc46/files
In-Reply-To: <e2e2de4baf6628527f284db4a0154735@shatow.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1309061755300.11903@tuna.site>
References: <201309052008.r85K8S8j073628@svn.freebsd.org>
 <e2e2de4baf6628527f284db4a0154735@shatow.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@freebsd.org>,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:12:49 -0000

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> PORTREVISION?

No. :-)  

This should be a build fix only for the "iconv in base" case.  If any
of you guys see a problem with GCC built that way and I need to come
up with a different patch, that'd be a PORTREVISION bump then, but I
hope to avoid that, especially since also lang/gcc has that patch and
I am minimizing any rebuilds of that based on user and peer feedback.

Gerald