From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 17:55:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD182106566C for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AC08FC0A for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so5034272bwz.13 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:55:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :x-comment-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=Di2YfL1qUdF+Wi2iqa2KX0c29eEdpok+9al2PDhuSDI=; b=ldHgYvYYWqYhAIubfgPoChmWKmogB/hey/rMrD5B139Q4Q3V4zsBM96Fk+QTq9X6mA h6qWvl8pgtor9rsSh7Aa5BKmD2KO33pjYTzOZ1dSAqyeuXthQD9+EdIElig53RtTqAo9 TMOeL//e9V3Sx3+VXrEvujTtt6x2qtWUDUaZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:x-comment-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=i7q8ELTtRpni178I0tSoHp77GPUf9FNEiv6Rhyj8cFGRV8NbjYBWfx0EPNQmliLFnP AR22s+SEFKqqWebjDbsC02KyH+WLEC1TsYREWxk0Weq7aDMbiVU1wp1EA2UOuDoAomou wuatJEazA+i9ziwA8nqo2b4ipc7ROS/nsBJ28= Received: by 10.204.120.67 with SMTP id c3mr3380165bkr.174.1290275749465; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([95.69.174.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f21sm1479244bkf.12.2010.11.20.09.55.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:55:48 -0800 (PST) From: Mikolaj Golub To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <86pqu0nexd.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20101120165604.T24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-Comment-To: Bjoern A. Zeeb Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:55:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20101120165604.T24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <86hbfbop5q.fsf@kopusha.home.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flowtable_cleaner/flowtable_flush livelock X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:55:52 -0000 On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote: BAZ> Hi, >> Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE) BAZ> ... >> So the question is who is guilty in this situation? ULE? flowtable? Or >> jail/epair, which should not allow simultaneous entering of flowtable_flush? BAZ> In general: you for running an experimental feature;-) I like experimenting :-) BAZ> What you could try is: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100216-10-ft-cv.diff I will. Thanks. -- Mikolaj Golub