From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 04:57:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3978116A417 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cliftonr@lava.net) Received: from malasada.lava.net (malasada.lava.net [64.65.64.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111AA13C474 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cliftonr@lava.net) Received: by malasada.lava.net (Postfix, from userid 102) id 5F6EF153882; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:57:50 -1000 (HST) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:57:50 -1000 From: Clifton Royston To: Greg Black Message-ID: <20071017045750.GC2455@lava.net> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Black , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20071004165755.GA1049@pp.htv.fi> <47120D83.1010703@FreeBSD.org> <20071015203202.GA17964@pp.htv.fi> <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20071016185714.GB2186@pp.htv.fi> <20071016130146.pfyan4vs5cwgsoc0@webmail.1command.com> <20071016202251.GC4047@lava.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:57:51 -0000 On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:24:29PM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > On 2007-10-16, Clifton Royston wrote: > > > Thanks for this very timely mention! The cluster of servers I am > > about to upgrade from 4.8 to 6.2 relies heavily on > > NFS to an old Netapp. If I have got to disable rpc_lockd and > > rpc_statd, it's good to know that now! > > > > Can I ask, can anybody confirm that they're running 6.2 on NFS > > successfully *with* lockd and statd? > > I have this combination running without any drama on a couple of > networks, so I doubt veery much if that is the fatal combination. Thanks for the rapid feedback. Glad to hear it was mistaken alarmism. I shall return to my usual state of apathy. -- Clifton -- Clifton Royston -- cliftonr@iandicomputing.com / cliftonr@lava.net President - I and I Computing * http://www.iandicomputing.com/ Custom programming, network design, systems and network consulting services