From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 11 04:42:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA03055 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 04:42:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (hq.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA03044 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 04:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.8.3/8.6.5) id RAA27645; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:41:23 +0600 (ESD) From: "Serge A. Babkin" Message-Id: <199707111141.RAA27645@hq.icb.chel.su> Subject: Re: /etc/init.d/ To: Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:41:22 +0600 (ESD) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199707111023.KAA07742@peedub.gj.org> from "Gary Jennejohn" at Jul 11, 97 10:23:29 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >> how about implementing /etc/init.d/ .. /etc/rc0.d etc Solaris-like > >> scheme in FreeBSD? I think it will be useful. And I am ready to do it. I think the scheme used in HP-UX 10 is better. It collects the scripts in /sbin/init.d, /sbin/rcX.d while their configuration files with tunable parameters are located in /etc/init.d. This allows to keep the configuration parameters between upgrades very easily. -SB