From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 11:13:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F6416A41A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1320F13C480 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0JMY00F4PSEWZRC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.202.72.202]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-3.01 (built Jul 12 2007; 32bit)) with SMTP id <0JMY00J9BSEV4353@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:13:43 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20070818121343.f5049c12.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-reply-to: References: <31BB09D7-B58A-47AC-8DD1-6BB8141170D8@khera.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.4 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH Subject: Re: large RAID volume partition strategy X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 11:13:46 -0000 On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:50:53 -0400 Vivek Khera wrote: > My only fear of this is that once this system is in production, > that's pretty much it. Maintenance windows are about 1 year apart, > usually longer. Seems to me you really should want a redundant / clustered system, allowing you to do maintenance on one server while running full production on the rest. Just my 0.2 euros. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen