From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 17:12:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA84B106566C; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Andriy Gapon Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:11:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4CDC25F2.6080409@freebsd.org> <201011112048.31127.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4CDCE1F0.9010806@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4CDCE1F0.9010806@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011121211.46833.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixup for missing C1 in _CST X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:12:00 -0000 On Friday 12 November 2010 01:42 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 12/11/2010 03:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > > On Thursday 11 November 2010 05:37 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:20 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> Dear fellow FreeBSD ACPI hackers, > >>> what is your opinion about the following patch? > >>> > >>> The idea is to add a C1 state to available states if a bugggy > >>> BIOS supplies us with _CST that has states with C2, C3, etc > >>> types, but no state with C1 type. > >> > >> Can you please try the attached patch instead? > > > > It seems C1 state became mandatory years ago. Please ignore the > > previous patches and try this instead. > > The patch looks OK to me. Committed as r215188. Thanks! Jung-uk Kim