Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 May 2007 14:06:43 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New FreeBSD package system (a.k.a. Daemon Package System (dps))
Message-ID:  <20070512120643.GA34770@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <f248bp$akg$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <200705102105.27271.blackdragon@highveldmail.co.za> <f20c8u$htp$1@sea.gmane.org> <46450EE1.300@hcl-club.lu> <f248bp$akg$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> cyclic dependancies in it!), but still, in itself, I think the choice of
> Ruby isn't performance-critical.

ruby2.0 will come with a virtual machine which should speed up things. ruby2.0
is expected "soon enough" (2008?)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070512120643.GA34770>