Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Aug 2018 15:56:16 -0700
From:      Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r337165 - head/sys/fs/fuse
Message-ID:  <CAG6CVpWF26LPu%2BM_oh-_9E=qQZbu16UzWdy_wo_uX-LDtXRWkg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpURd_V7T%2BgCB_gTmx1Q-3p1rhqy7YFDLY9eSH89%2BSE=sA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201808021925.w72JPhIu086582@repo.freebsd.org> <CANCZdfp14_geVtU3M=s=bs%2BYaKaUAmxJKKkBnA4o3CLLoeYmQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6CVpURd_V7T%2BgCB_gTmx1Q-3p1rhqy7YFDLY9eSH89%2BSE=sA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> wrote:
> It was chosen arbitrarily.  Either is a big improvement over 4k.
>
> According to the bug reporter, 64k is a common choice in other
> implementations.  But I have no objection to MAXPHYS.

(It should probably be globally tunable/sysctlable, at least, or
perhaps a mount option.  This was just the minimum diff change to
remove a large bottleneck.)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpWF26LPu%2BM_oh-_9E=qQZbu16UzWdy_wo_uX-LDtXRWkg>