From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 10 14:54:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF3337B422 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:54:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (root@ns1.unixathome.org [192.168.0.20]) by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3ALsce84245; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:54:39 +1200 (NZST) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Message-Id: <200104102154.f3ALsce84245@ns1.unixathome.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: novice in training To: "David O'Brien" Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:54:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Releases Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <20010410144804.B20548@hub.freebsd.org> References: ; from dan@langille.org on Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:32:15AM +1200 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 10 Apr 2001, at 14:48, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:32:15AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote: > > AFAIK, the thread to date has been about whether or not [something like] > > the label "-development" would cause less confusion than "-current". My > > And then we'd have people who CVSup'ed -development because they wanted to > develop an application on FreeBSD. Thanks. I like that one. Then -unstable is a better name then - development. But we've moved on from this I think. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message