From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 22:18:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEB106566C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:18:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A378FC1C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8JMI2iV007951; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q8JMI26n007948; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Walter Hurry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:18:02 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:18:08 -0000 On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:26:45 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > >> For ports, it's probably worth saving the distfile directory along with >> local diffs. Move it back into place after the svn checkout of the >> ports tree. > > PMFJI. Newbie here: What's wrong with using SVN for src, and portsnap for > ports? That's another way. If there are any local changes to the ports tree, portsnap will overwrite them. I also find portsnap slower than either csup or svn.