From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 24 19:56:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C20C416A4CE; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:56:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6477443D49; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:56:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com)
Received: (from dan@localhost)
	by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id j2OJuSmm089490;
	Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:56:28 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from dan)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:56:28 -0600
From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20050324195628.GC10908@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <1110800717.1296.19.camel@localhost>
	<200503231411.46948.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050323154642.J37251@sasami.jurai.net>
	<42421D8D.5060502@elischer.org> <20050323205841.N37251@sasami.jurai.net>
	<77e48641fc04164b4c81cce75c42a38b@FreeBSD.org> <42431806.3060302@elischer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42431806.3060302@elischer.org>
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE
X-message-flag: Outlook Error
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
cc: Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru>
cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@freebsd.org>
cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Reattach/redetect allways connected umass device - is it
	possible ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:56:38 -0000

In the last episode (Mar 24), Julian Elischer said:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >On Mar 23, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> >>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>>eject should imply a detach..
> >>>i.e. I think your patch should call the detach code from the eject 
> >>>code.
> >>
> >>Eject is for devices that support removable media.
> 
> that doesn't mean that an eject shouldn't do all teh work for a
> detach as well.

I would be extremely surprised if a "camcontrol eject cd0" removed
/dev/cd0 :)  Eject is for devices whose media can be removed, but the
device itself stays.

Or are you just saying detach should do an eject (possibly a stop also)
first?

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com