From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Sep 20 16:54:35 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA15463
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:54:35 -0700
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA15453
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:54:24 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id AAA01103
	  ; Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:38:36 +0100
To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" <ugen@latte.worldbank.org>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Nate Williams <nate@trout.sri.mt.net>
Subject: Re: Firewalling one interface using IPFW? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Sep 1995 16:28:31 PDT."
             <Chameleon.4.00.4.950920162930.ugen@ugen> 
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:38:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1101.811640315@palmer.demon.co.uk>
From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Chameleon.4.00.4.950920162930.ugen@ugen>, "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" wr
ites:
>As far as i remember my own code( heh, i already forgot it for good)..
>you have option "via" or "at" which both allow to set all the firewalls
>for one interface only. Other interfaces would not be affected by the 
>permissions...

Speaking as someone currently working on improving the ipfw docs -
``via'' does allow you to tie rules to packets from a specific
interface.

Hope this helps :-)

Gary