From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jul 24 00:22:35 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA05013
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alpha.netvision.net.il (alpha.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.13])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA05008
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 1998 00:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from gena@NetVision.net.il)
Received: from Burka.NetVision.net.il (burka.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.23])
	by alpha.netvision.net.il (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA16853;
	Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:20:27 +0300 (IDT)
Message-ID: <XFMail.980724102356.gena@NetVision.net.il>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <199807240108.SAA12009@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
X-XFMail-Comment: Experimental version - for developers only
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 10:23:56 +0300 (IDT)
X-Face: #v>4HN>#D_"[olq9y`HqTYkLVB89Xy|3')Vs<XpQKn_?U}en./<W?@-rH/+)Wj-@|6n_Oo)
 Li~B_?}Ay>9v58JQ*u-xEJVKY`xa.}E?z0RkLI/P&;BJmi0#u=W0).-Y'J4(dw{<wUBg4lk?f~:^$*
 ]uVJ8QL7?pkdpIzy$~}7dUNL:j`MJ!a)p{9['r7{ALM{x9V:i#B~N}LZ~+>"54NhSG|YYZG@[)(`e!
 >jN#L!~qI5fE-JHS+<
Organization: NetVision Ltd.
From: Gennady Sorokopud <gena@NetVision.net.il>
To: (Satoshi Asami) <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: RE: xforms compatibility
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id AAA05009
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hi!

The latest version of xfmail (1.3) was developed with xforms-0.88.1, so there shouldn't
be any problem.

Also 0.88.1 is merely a bug-fix release.

On 24-Jul-98 Satoshi Asami wrote:
> It was brought to my attention that xforms-0.88.1 is not compatible
> with older versions.  In particular, xfmail doesn't correctly work
> when linked to the latest xforms library.
> 
> Is this true?  If so, can you ask the xforms authors to bump the
> shared library version number to correctly indicate the
> incompatibility?  Also, we will have to split the xforms port into two 
> and rename the libraries so that dependent ports can select either
> one.
> 
> Thanks,
> Satoshi

Best regards.
--------
 Gennady B. Sorokopud - System programmer at NetVision Israel.
 E-Mail: Gennady Sorokopud <gena@NetVision.net.il>
 PGP public key is available through PGP keyserver.

 This message was sent at 24-Jul-98 10:23:56 by XFMail

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message