From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Apr 16 14:07:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03069 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 14:07:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03025 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 21:07:35 GMT (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA18562; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 17:02:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 17:02:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Niall Smart cc: Tim Vanderhoek , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, denny1@home.com, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: bin/4154 In-Reply-To: <199804161021.LAA00729@indigo.ie> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 16 Apr 1998, Niall Smart wrote: > Our "sleep n" isn't equivalent to OpenBSD's "sleep n" because they > allow floating point numbers. Are you proposing to allow this and > forget about all that dHMSu stuff? Perhaps that would be a better > idea. Would that break anything? :) That was the original proposal. :-) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message