From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 10 11:49:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA20927 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:49:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (CEDB.DPCSYS.com [207.124.154.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA20921 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with SMTP id TAA17875; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 19:33:59 GMT Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 11:33:59 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow To: Chris Bura cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache In-Reply-To: <199702101559.HAA26941@main.netcorps.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Chris Bura wrote: > We've been using Apache as our web server on our BSD machines. Everything > was fine untill about a month ago, when Apache decided it didn't want to > do hostname resolving anymore. Apache just uses gethostbyaddr() to resolv addresses to names. Did you change anything in your DNS back then. Changed /etc/resolv.conf? Does nslookup work? > Does it have to do with the number of V hosts? Is 125 really high? It might. If you're running named on this machine it may be having problems caused by binding to all the addresses. If you are running named on this machine try turning it off and pointing to another nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf > Right now we're using the actuall domain names in the virtual server > directives. Should we use the IP address instead? Would that ease the > workload? It won't ease the workload but it does speedup startup and reloading a lot. Dan -- Dan Busarow 714 443 4172 DPC Systems / Beach.Net dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82