Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:11:51 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204877 - head/sys/modules/acpi/acpi Message-ID: <20100308201151.GA21962@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201003081940.o28JeVG1088074@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201003081940.o28JeVG1088074@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 07:40:31PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Author: jkim > Date: Mon Mar 8 19:40:31 2010 > New Revision: 204877 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/204877 > > Log: > Enable ACPI module build on amd64. Although we strongly recommend building > it into kernel, there is no need to prevent it from building at all. FWIW, is there any difference between loading acpi.ko from loader.conf with "device acpi"-less kernel, and having ACPI compiled in? (I am interested in both i386 and amd64 cases.) I normally offload everything possible to modules (including `mem' and `io') and wonder it is safe thing to do for `acpi' as well. Thanks. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100308201151.GA21962>