From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 16 13:14:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAEE1065672; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D948FC1C; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665C66D41B; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F0613844F3; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:14:06 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Wes Peters References: <20091119004651.7432a6e4.nork@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:14:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Wes Peters's message of "Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:36:27 -0800") Message-ID: <86zl5jjc2p.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alexander Motin , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Norikatsu Shigemura Subject: Re: How do I use NCQ of Intel X25-E(SSD) on ahci(4)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:14:08 -0000 Wes Peters writes: > How useful is NCQ on an SSD? *extremely* useful. The X25 is old (as SSDs go), yet it still blows the competition out of the water on real-world (non-sequential) workloads, precisely because it supports NCQ and most of its competitors don't. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no