Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:40:03 GMT From: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/150517: [acpi] acpi_ec does not work properly on Lenovo S10[e] (due to dynamic switching to polled mode) Message-ID: <201010020640.o926e3Ju087781@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR kern/150517; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/150517: [acpi] acpi_ec does not work properly on Lenovo S10[e] (due to dynamic switching to polled mode) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:31:17 +0200 --nextPart6155206.lNfR8abAcT Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 27 September 2010 07:53:51 Andriy Gapon wrote: > Since you already looked at the linux code, could you please post a link = to > a place where the problematic condition is handled there? >=20 > P.S. A service like http://lxr.linux.no/ or similar might be convenient. Sorry for the slow reply. Your email was mistaken as spam. I've told gmai= l=20 to behave. =20 It has been a long time since I looked at the code. The function in questi= on=20 is http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.35.7/drivers/acpi/ec.c#L217 with the actu= al=20 check for controller reset at L238. =20 Of note is the delay at L254. It looks like it is almost the same thing my= =20 patch does, except it waits before whereas my patch waits after. =20 --nextPart6155206.lNfR8abAcT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkym0bkACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKnnACfbtzDzT316oC4jmBcSAK/aNdc HGQAn140T2kFljemg5tQCuXsxDC9/W+u =VVrY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6155206.lNfR8abAcT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201010020640.o926e3Ju087781>