Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:26:49 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: Intron is my alias on the Internet <intron@intron.ac> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another VIA UniChrome/Chrome9 Driver Message-ID: <1226424409.10032.6.camel@squirrel.corp.cox.com> In-Reply-To: <courier.4919BA9B.00012041@intron.ac> References: <courier.49199C4C.00010EA3@intron.ac> <1226418439.10032.2.camel@squirrel.corp.cox.com> <courier.4919BA9B.00012041@intron.ac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-UqHh5KDULnluoOF5aEWo Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 01:02 +0800, Intron is my alias on the Internet wrote: > But so far, as I know, it's the unique solution that makes my laptop > work. What do you mean by "work". Does the normal xorg driver not work for your chip? Let me go look at the ddx driver... > And I guess it supports more new chips. >=20 > I have quite a few products with VIA chipset: >=20 > * A laptop with UniChrome Pro IGP (0x3343) This pci_id is listed in drm, so if I finish porting the code, it should work, for some definition of work... ;) robert. > * Motherboard VIA PC2500E with north bridge CN700 > * Motherboard VIA PC3500E with north bridge CN896 --=-UqHh5KDULnluoOF5aEWo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkkZwFkACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPEMwCfUJ+Lq1E0hR9iZWnhENuRcBp1 9F4An32a89rhl2S1jTrLckcRkX7vHzIs =6CB5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UqHh5KDULnluoOF5aEWo--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1226424409.10032.6.camel>