Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:02 +0200 From: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck@web.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Quick status update on Squid 3.x ports Message-ID: <20120927052202.GA2077@wcfields.tmseck.homedns.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, this is just a short update on the status of Squid 3 ports. As you may have noticed I am a bit behind with regards to Squid 3.2. Sorry for that -- I could not spend much time for ports development in the last few months. To add insult to injury I will be offline for the next couple of days but I plan to have the 3.2 port ready in the week starting Oct 7 nonetheless. I just submitted an update request for 3.1 to 3.1.21 for the time being. On a side note: in the past, the default Squid port was named www/squid and the older or development Squid versions had versioned port directory names. Should we move www/squid to www/squid27 instead and make all Squid dependend ports that currently depend on www/squid use www/squid27 instead? Best regards --=20 Thomas-Martin Seck --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBj4nkACgkQJEQv4d9G7gXShwCfWCB7RJHSM4LvunQRD3gvf0/x r0cAoLXmi9BFEVW5D6puzLKEzes69Csy =VWtS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120927052202.GA2077>