From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 05:22:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32E81065676 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tmseck@web.de) Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340678FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de [89.1.8.202]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363F712595 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wcfields.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-89-0-167-172.netcologne.de [89.0.167.172]) by cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2673811D89 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wcfields.tmseck.homedns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BEA9F130C20; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 07:22:02 +0200 From: Thomas-Martin Seck To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120927052202.GA2077@wcfields.tmseck.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: a private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 X-Attribution: tms Subject: Quick status update on Squid 3.x ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:22:10 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, this is just a short update on the status of Squid 3 ports. As you may have noticed I am a bit behind with regards to Squid 3.2. Sorry for that -- I could not spend much time for ports development in the last few months. To add insult to injury I will be offline for the next couple of days but I plan to have the 3.2 port ready in the week starting Oct 7 nonetheless. I just submitted an update request for 3.1 to 3.1.21 for the time being. On a side note: in the past, the default Squid port was named www/squid and the older or development Squid versions had versioned port directory names. Should we move www/squid to www/squid27 instead and make all Squid dependend ports that currently depend on www/squid use www/squid27 instead? Best regards --=20 Thomas-Martin Seck --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBj4nkACgkQJEQv4d9G7gXShwCfWCB7RJHSM4LvunQRD3gvf0/x r0cAoLXmi9BFEVW5D6puzLKEzes69Csy =VWtS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--