From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Aug 12 16:02:50 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA00187
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA00156;
          Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca1-94.ix.netcom.com [209.109.232.94]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA26363; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id QAA09752; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199808122302.QAA09752@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Mesa2/Mesa3
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Justin,

What do you want to do with this?  Their shared libraries only differ
in version numbers so they can't be both installed on the package
building machine unless we're never going to link anything against
Mesa2.

I marked Mesa3 MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD for now.  Otherwise we'll have
packages with binaries linked against Mesa3 but with a @pkgdep of
Mesa2.

You said they're compatible.  Do you want to switch over all the
dependencies to Mesa3?  In that case, please remove
MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD and switch over the NO_LATEST_LINK to Mesa2.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message