From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 31 23:23:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7037B684
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 23:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f117MK928921;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 00:22:40 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200102010722.f117MK928921@harmony.village.org>
To: Richard Hodges <rh@matriplex.com>
Subject: Re: NEWBUS: multiple calls needed? 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:02:50 PST."
		<Pine.BSF.4.10.10101261750060.31475-100000@mail.matriplex.com> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10101261750060.31475-100000@mail.matriplex.com>  
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 00:22:20 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.10101261750060.31475-100000@mail.matriplex.com> Richard Hodges writes:
: So of course, it is tempting to wonder whether it is really neccessary
: to allocate three newbus entities for them.  

Yes, it is.  Other mobo's bios may allocate thing differently and it
might not wind up being contiguous.  I had the pleasure of
troubleshooting a driver once that mad bad assumptions about where the
BIOS would map its BARs...

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message