From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 10:07:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F3037B401 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.silverwraith.com (66-214-182-79.la-cbi.charterpipeline.net [66.214.182.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308EB43F85 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:07:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avleen@silverwraith.com) Received: from avleen by mail.silverwraith.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19MsmE-000Emg-UI for security@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 10:07:18 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:07:18 -0700 From: Avleen Vig To: security@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030602170718.GU294@silverwraith.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Avleen Vig Subject: Exim as default MTA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:07:20 -0000 Yes, I've been reading /. :) But this isn't the first time this has occured to me. With all the security vulnerbilties, would it be unreasonable to either change the default MTA from sendmail to Exim/Qmail/Postfix, or give people the option of installing something instead of Sendmail at install time? -- Avleen Vig "Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys" Systems Admin "Fast, Good, Cheap. Pick any two." www.silverwraith.com "Move BSD. For great justice!"