From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan 21 12:59:43 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913E737B430
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id EEEE33A; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:59:14 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 14:59:14 -0600
From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.cc>
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review
Message-ID: <20020121145914.A91420@hellblazer.nectar.cc>
References: <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202344.g0KNijt34738@grimreaper.grondar.org> <3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6@mindspring.com> <20020121140516.GB57549@madman.nectar.cc> <3C4C7EA7.66CBFC0D@mindspring.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3C4C7EA7.66CBFC0D@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:48:39PM -0800
X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:48:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:43:28PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to
> > > integrate PAM and Kerberos?  8-) 8-) 8-).
> > 
> > In what way do you mean?
> 
> In the way that the author of the PAM architecture from Sun
> spoke at the Silicon Valley BSD User's Group meeting, 

Do you have a reference, or do we have to guess what you are talking
about? :-)

> and
> there are just some things that can't be wedged into the
> PAM framework until the framework is changed.

That is certainly true.  It's also true if s/PAM/foo/ for most values
of foo.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc>                     http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME           .      FreeBSD UNIX      .        Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine@verio.net      .   nectar@FreeBSD.org   .           nectar@kth.se

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message