From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 11 19:06:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EC516A419 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3BD13C4D3 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:06:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1BJ37On005428; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:03:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m1BJ2klK005424; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:03:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:02:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Reid Linnemann In-Reply-To: <47B0985A.2030804@cs.okstate.edu> Message-ID: <20080211200141.G5406@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <47B05C7A.80602@pacific.net.sg> <200802111540.34420.wundram@beenic.net> <200802112036.50352.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> <47B0985A.2030804@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jonathan McKeown Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:06:23 -0000 >> Jonathan > > The information I posted appears to be irrelevant now; from > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/96374 the license issue > appears to be resolved, but FreeBSD is still not permitted to > "distribute" linux-flashplugin, that right being reserved by > "authorized" operating systems and thus requiring the restricted flag. > But they don't prohibit individual user from grabbing flash for FreeBSD > on their own. this is excellent licence. this will make users smart enough to use ports subsystem - able to use it, while others (who installed FreeBSD because they heard it's better than linux vista or whatever) - will not ;)