Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:35:09 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster is not always recursive Message-ID: <4A9B8B3D.9020504@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908301307540.11734@qbhto.arg> References: <4A89CB20.3000408@quip.cz> <4A8E2121.6040507@FreeBSD.org> <4A8E8ACA.3060705@quip.cz> <4A8EF583.8090806@FreeBSD.org> <4A9966FE.7060509@quip.cz> <4A998242.80005@FreeBSD.org> <4A999B4A.3000603@quip.cz> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908300952370.43298@qbhto.arg> <4A9ADAE6.70506@quip.cz> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908301307540.11734@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton ha scritto: >> Does it mean that portmaster checks only first level dependencies >> unless -t is given? (Maybe it is good behavior, I am just asking it to >> be sure that I understand it well) > > That's not exactly right, but it's about 90% right so close enough. :) > The discrepancy relates to how individual ports report their > dependencies, but for almost all purposes that is correct, yes. This is the reason apache is not taken as a dependency. php extensions depend only on php, while php itself depends on apache if mod_php is compiled. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A9B8B3D.9020504>