From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Oct 8 21:35:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA23223 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:35:22 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA23216 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:35:15 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA00220; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:35:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id VAA01160; Sun, 8 Oct 1995 21:35:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199510090435.VAA01160@corbin.Root.COM> To: adrian@virginia.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whatsup with cdrom.com ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 95 00:19:25 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Sun, 08 Oct 1995 21:35:04 -0700 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >On Sat, 7 Oct 1995, Gary Palmer wrote: > >> I don't wcarchive has ever supported 500 users. I could be wrong > > I know at ome point the limit was advertised as 550 and there >were on average > 490 users on at any point. I believe this was last >fall. I remember this point, because I used it as a bragging feature to >convice people to try FreeBSD. ;-) As has already been said, wcarchive had more memory then (192MB). I think we had the anonymous limit at around 400-450 for awhile, and it may have been as high as 500-550 for short periods. For the future (say 3-6 months from now), there are plans to upgrade the machine to handle that type of load again...we just need more memory. -DG