From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 05:11:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8F716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:11:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (sbk-gw.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16DD43D66 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:11:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sbk-gw.sibnet.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBT5Avk7031213; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:10:57 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) Received: from localhost (stranger@localhost)iBT5AueY031210; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:10:56 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: sbk-gw.sibnet.ru: stranger owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 11:10:56 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" X-X-Sender: stranger@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru To: Lawrence Farr In-Reply-To: <20041223211430.517A667AF4@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> Message-ID: <20041229110957.W31157@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> References: <20041223211430.517A667AF4@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=7.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_20 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on sbk-gw.sibnet.ru cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: 'Evren Yurtesen' cc: 'Stefan Cars' Subject: RE: amd64 or i386 on PE 1850 Intel Xeon with EMT64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:11:25 -0000 Is EM64T is capable to support more that 4Gb RAM? AMD64 does. The news I know told me that Intel have problems with more than 32 bit addressing. Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Lawrence Farr wrote: > The Xeon EMT64 is 64 bit, and the amd64 port of FreeBSD runs > on it just fine apparently. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Evren Yurtesen >> Sent: 24 December 2004 07:10 >> To: Stefan Cars >> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: amd64 or i386 on PE 1850 Intel Xeon with EMT64 >> >> amd64 on intel? I dont think it would work. >> >> You should use i386. >> >> To use amd64, you should get an 64bit AMD processor like AMD Athlon 64 >> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_1 > 18_9484,00.html >> >> Evren >> >> Stefan Cars wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> How stable is amd64 on Intel Xeon with EMT64 ? We have a >> new PE 1850 >>> with 4GB memory and two dual 2.8 Xeons. Should I go with >> i386 or amd64 ? >>> Which one is most stable and what will I gain from amd64 ? >>> >>> Kind Regards, >>> Stefan Cars >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >