From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 22 09:11:51 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA27321 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 22 May 1995 09:11:51 -0700 Received: from limbic.ssdl.com (limbic.ssdl.com [192.111.251.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA27315 for ; Mon, 22 May 1995 09:11:49 -0700 Received: (from gil@localhost) by limbic.ssdl.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA20044 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 May 1995 11:11:47 -0500 From: "Gil Kloepfer Jr." Message-Id: <199505221611.LAA20044@limbic.ssdl.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD question... To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 11:11:46 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <199505221354.GAA00185@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at May 22, 95 06:54:07 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 582 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >I recently heard that FreeBSD was no longer being supported and/or > >developed. Is this true?? Thanks in advance for replying. > > Exactly the opposite. Where did you hear that??? I can't answer for the original poster, but when I started working at one of my jobs some time ago, a lot of the people there thought that 386BSD and FreeBSD were the same animal. I have a feeling that the person heard that 386BSD was no longer being supported, but it got changed to FreeBSD in the translation. -- Gil Kloepfer e-mail: gil@SSDL.COM WWW: http://www.ssdl.com/~gil/