From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 25 21:08:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA15321
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15316
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id VAA09893; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703260509.VAA09893@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: perry@piermont.com
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, cjs@portal.ca, hackers@freebsd.org,
        port-i386@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: how to name fs specific programs 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:42:33 EST."
             <199703260442.XAA03826@jekyll.piermont.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:09:06 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>By the by, let me note: I'm not continuing this discussion.
>
>I think my point that there is no good reason to rename the commands
>(and lots of reasons not to since it breaks compatibility) has been
>made. I'm sure you can strain your mind to think of lots more
>"reasons" if you can call what you've posted thus far "reasons", and
>by all means, feel free to implement them in FreeBSD if your fellow
>FreeBSD developers think its a good idea.

   We have no plans or intentions on making any changes in this area.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project