From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon May  5 15:47:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA25589
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 15:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA25584
          for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 May 1997 15:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA01113; Mon, 5 May 1997 15:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 15:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705052247.PAA01113@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: james@nexis.net
CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970505064809.10060A-100000@nexis.net> (message from James FitzGibbon on Mon, 5 May 1997 06:54:52 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: Use of perl5 "virtual" category.
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * It seems that the initial add of ports to this category added anything
 * that depended on perl5.  When the original discussion came up about the
 * category, I assumed that people were talking about my perl5 modules, and
 * the lack of a separate category being annoying to programmer types.

No objections from me.

Satoshi