From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 13 09:18:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA27269 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 13 May 1997 09:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pahtoh.cwu.edu (root@pahtoh.cwu.edu [198.104.65.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA27264 for ; Tue, 13 May 1997 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by pahtoh.cwu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA08933; Tue, 13 May 1997 09:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA26527; Tue, 13 May 1997 09:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 09:18:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons To: Michael Hancock cc: Michael Smith , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: if_de.c ???? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk 3COM will provide data sheets for their products that are reasonably useful to developers - without requiring a head stand or other unpleasant gyrations (save those for getting next week's version of the etherlink III going :) IMHO 3COM is a FreeBSD-friendly company. -Chris On Tue, 13 May 1997, Michael Hancock wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > > > > I didn't know SMC was having problems. I think 3COM and Intel pushing for > > > integrated ethernet on the motherboard is more of threat to SMC than the > > > clone makers. > > > > *laugh* First thing I'd do with a motherboard with a 3com chip on it is > > put a decent ethernet card in it 8) > > I used to think the same way, but the recent 3COM stuff seems to be pretty > good. > > Mike >