From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 12 02:07:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7941516A41F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:07:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com
	[206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCBE343D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:07:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: (qmail 32687 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2005 02:07:51 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
	h=Received:X-Squirrel-UserHash:X-Squirrel-FromHash:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=4l+UwurvtgJUNkFBpBQfBoTZucDhPdHT7yBGLnE1EsI1PYIL2FxJLqzjZUEZaCxYqdGmD0Q5aoe2wfw/sXPgGSSVUj7wgMCbAIjw2jJnuerjoJr74S8aZTVL8ND3bfyO2y0WhYO3lsIukx1dIRSqIe+eDbXOPaziRsn45AgncDA=
	; 
Received: from unknown (HELO 172.16.0.1) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.81 with
	login)
	by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2005 02:07:50 -0000
X-Squirrel-UserHash: GgEKEQ8=
X-Squirrel-FromHash: FgtQRFVGBkU=
Message-ID: <1422.FgtQRFVGBkU=.1129082866.squirrel@172.16.0.1>
In-Reply-To: <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <434BCDF6.3090303@samsco.org> <digpfu$r1b$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org> <digtbv$9jk$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>
To: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 available
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:07:52 -0000

On Tue, October 11, 2005 1:39 pm, Joshua Coombs wrote:
>

> "Scott Long" <scottl@samsco.org> wrote in message
> news:434BEC96.4050801@samsco.org...
>
>> Joshua Coombs wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Given that we're in the RC stage, is it too late to get a PR
>>> stuffed in to correct ntpd/ntpdate behavior in /etc/rc.d?
>>>
>>> Joshua Coombs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Depends on the kind of problem that you are seeing.  Any details?
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>
> Two issues I spotted.
>
>
> First, ntpdate is still being used, despite it being marked as
> depreciated for quite some time.  The preferred replacement is to call ntpd
> with the -q switch.  This causes ntpd to match ntpdate's behavior, it sets

I like my ntpdate command, and im not about to change all my scripts and
configure some ntpd servers just to quickly sync the time.