From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 26 16:51:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.vnet.net (smtp1.vnet.net [166.82.1.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F85E14EB1 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 16:51:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by smtp1.vnet.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA19836; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:51:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes.dignus.com [10.0.0.3]) by dignus.com (8.9.2/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02547; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.9.2/8.6.9) id TAA29273; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:51:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:51:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199909262351.TAA29273@lakes.dignus.com> To: Doug@gorean.org, rivers@dignus.com Subject: Re: -stable (in)stability (was Re: Best version of FBSD for INN ?) Cc: ady@warpnet.ro, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk, scrappy@hub.org In-Reply-To: <37EE88B5.627D77F1@gorean.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If you are interested in tracking this problem you should subscribe to > -stable, which is a low-volume list most of the time. Thanks, I'll add that list to the others I'm on. Particularly since it is low-volume. Believe me, I know getting multiple copies or mis-directed e-mails is aggravating! You mention that 3.3-RELEASE won't be the same as -Stable. Is there some way for a resource-constraint environment to assist with debugging issues in this situation? Perhaps, in this case, -Stable hasn't moved very far (as 3.3-RELEASE was just produced?) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message