From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Oct 12 07:58:53 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA18524
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 07:58:53 -0700
Received: from spot.lodgenet.com (lodgenet.iw.net [204.157.148.88])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA18490
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 07:57:19 -0700
Received: from jake.lodgenet.com (jake.lodgenet.com [204.124.120.30]) by spot.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA21822 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 09:56:23 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jake.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA06384 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 1995 10:03:53 -0500
Message-Id: <199510121503.KAA06384@jake.lodgenet.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: jake.lodgenet.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Netatalk once again...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 10:03:53 -0500
From: "Eric L. Hernes" <erich@lodgenet.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Does anyone have this working on -current?  I've seen some traffic
in the mail archives, but I didn't see a concensus on whether or
not it worked.

eric.
--
erich@lodgenet.com
erich@rrnet.com