From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 07:01:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC2F37B401 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 07:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MX2.estpak.ee (ld1.estpak.ee [194.126.101.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AD143FA3 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 07:01:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-40-230-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.40.230]) by MX2.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512C5734C0; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 16:59:29 +0300 (EEST) Received: by kevad.internal (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18D1530B80; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:01:14 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:01:14 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Petri Helenius Message-ID: <20030602070114.GC2605@kevad.internal> References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31> <20030602050917.GB2247@kevad.internal> <03dc01c32902$f09bc680$812a40c1@PETEX31> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03dc01c32902$f09bc680$812a40c1@PETEX31> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raidframe X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 14:01:11 -0000 On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:31:49PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: > > FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to > > production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste > > your time. > > This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone. > > IMO, software does not magically get better but it must be actively > being used and problems reported and fixed in reasonable time. > > So if 5.x never gets users it never gets production quality. As do I, but I initially thought you needed stable platform. I vaguely remember your mails about some network related things etc. which seemed to indicate such need. I've sent you personal reply. Sorry. -- Vallo Kallaste