From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 1 11:01:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19953AE for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x22a.google.com (mail-ve0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60E92A4E for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 15so2097069vea.29 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 04:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=OnwGB5xxxm+6UTyzHyiv+LE/Wv5tfdI7nc7PCrHw3Fw=; b=mxDEhLEajEp9lOrMg3bNpoGeuO1X/UWz4c0iee4/JVkkSYKkrrTiEnBoSss6EeMw+v WMvoibiYm6x8avzZBwvmSAxF/+44HhyoflsICaa7dT0Nk59IO0yyBEwTXzzgtXDMWs87 YylD1cdCG281Qi0FAo5+wjVs9JCBfgEeWMKewQ3hXwqbMvHifLiwD/v0Rjupgaa6P5U7 QDYr4nbswp0HImNax6b6hJIIPnaUVGwxcFIaX8F3XS/EEvev9IdLhVY7Xxl5Ru2REpIy JNLTUVh6eHpFTOD3nd2fYXX2tFjornqE25NlJmfydn9UurFGHwSYxTAjIW6v5QzvQ0jt sIbg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.118.8 with SMTP id ki8mr256055veb.84.1375354913906; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 04:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.38.134 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 04:01:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:01:53 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Strange sendmail behaviour after upgrade to 9.1-BETA2 From: Pavel Timofeev To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:01:55 -0000 Here is dig output of our domain root@test:/etc/mail # dig xxx.ru IN MX ; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-P2 <<>> xxx.ru IN MX ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39091 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;xxx.ru. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION: xxx.ru. 3600 IN MX 10 kalmar.xxx.ru. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: kalmar.xxx.ru. 3600 IN A 192.168.31.190 ;; Query time: 1 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.2.12#53(192.168.2.12) ;; WHEN: Thu Aug 1 15:00:23 2013 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 63 2013/8/1 Pavel Timofeev : > I'm sorry( > So resolver is MS server. > > But does it matter when it works good with 9.1 and doesn't work with 9.2? > > What I have to do for investigation? > > > 2013/8/1 Kimmo Paasiala : >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Pavel Timofeev wrote: >>> Ok, I understand. Thanks a lot for excelent explanation. Maybe >>> sendmail ignores additional section? >>> >>> I use _default_ fresh system, so resolver is _default_ bind. >>> For investigation I've just installed fresh 9.1-RELEASE amd64, email >>> delivery works and picture looks different than on 9.2: >>> >> >> The default resolver is not BIND because it's not enabled by default. >> The nameservers listed in /etc/resolv.conf are used for resolving >> addresses in default setup (assuming they are filled properly by DHCP >> client or manually by user). >> >> -Kimmo