From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 24 09:58:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD25D16A4CF
	for <mobile@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:58:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay03.pair.com (relay03.pair.com [209.68.5.17])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B17E43D1D
	for <mobile@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:58:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwalton@acm.org)
Received: (qmail 5397 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 09:58:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.1.34?) (unknown)
  by unknown with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 09:58:22 -0000
X-pair-Authenticated: 68.124.184.89
Message-ID: <41F4C68C.404@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 01:57:32 -0800
From: Dave Walton <dwalton@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <41EF6A90.1010101@acm.org>
	<20050120.101040.130846709.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050120.101040.130846709.imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: OLDCARD to go away
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dwalton@acm.org
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:58:23 -0000

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> The TI 1251 is fully supported.  If it isn't working for you, then
> there are other issues at work that need to be solved.  I've used the
> 1251 with cbb.
> 
> This smells like a resource allocation issue.  The card was seen as
> being there, but when the card was probed for its information, we
> found none.
> 
> The biggest difference between newcard and oldcard in the CIS area is
> that newcard asks the system for memory region to use from high
> memory, while oldcard has a value passed in, usually from the ISA hole.

Ok, given that cbb and pcic both report the same memory block and irq,
what could the difference be?  How do I troubleshoot this?

Thanks,
Dave