From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 8 13:33:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA00838 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:33:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.harborcom.net (root@ns2.harborcom.net [206.158.4.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA00833 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from swoosh.dunn.org (swoosh.dunn.org [206.158.7.243]) by ns2.harborcom.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA09153; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 16:33:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 16:31:06 -0500 () From: Bradley Dunn To: andrew@pubnix.net cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as an ISDN Router ***Additional Info*** In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: bradley@harborcom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Andrew Webster wrote: > Have you considered using RFC 1579 compliant non-routable internal > addresses "just in case": > 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 > 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 > 198.168.0.0 - 198.168.255.255 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255. RFC 1918 is the most recent RFC covering this. -BD