From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 2 07:17:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA10318 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA10313; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 07:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA03377; Wed, 2 Oct 1996 16:16:39 +0200 (MET DST) To: Andrzej Bialecki cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timed vs. NTP In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:16:45 +0200." Date: Wed, 02 Oct 1996 16:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3375.844265799@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message , Andr zej Bialecki writes: >Hi, > >I just stumbled across a certain problem: I must use a kind of NTP >between a few FBSD machines (one of them has horribly unstable clock :-( >So I thought the timed would be good for this. But it seems the timed >works only on the same LAN, and my machines are connected through >Internet (several routers between). >Well, I looked for a port of NTP daemon in /ports, but there is none. >Could someone suggest me a way to solve this (I'm prepared even to some >hacking of timed code, if need be...)? man xntpd ? :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.