From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Oct 25 15:41:51 1995 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA25453 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 15:41:51 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA25438 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 15:41:46 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id XAA04481 ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:41:34 +0100 Received: from (uucp@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with UUCP id XAA28909 ; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:41:34 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.7.1/keltia-uucp-2.6) id XAA25243; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:32:17 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert Message-Id: <199510252232.XAA25243@keltia.freenix.fr> Subject: Re: moving some mail. To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:32:16 +0100 (MET) Cc: jmb@kryten.atinc.com, gary@palmer.demon.co.uk, chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <27644.814631999@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Oct 25, 95 07:39:59 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#1255 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk It seems that Jordan K. Hubbard said: > I think what *really* needs to happen is for sendmail to get a lot > smarter about this.. Sendmail knows who it can't reach, and if it > kept timing statistics for some number of "frequent destinations" then > it could even intuit who was slow and who was fast, reordering its > work queue accordingly. Sendmail has to work in every situation and it can only use data it has access to (i.e. the MX). As for the cache for "frequent destinations", it is difficult to maintain between each invocation. For outbound direction it already reorder per MX then use the connection cache but how to want him to remember that foo.com is just one hop away from bar.de when the MX are not thought for it ? Exploders are more a solution than hacking sendmail I think. Sendmail is already too much complicated :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #2: Sun Oct 22 20:22:48 MET 1995