Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, "John S. Dyson" <dyson@iquest.net>, samit@usa.ltindia.com, commiters@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: rfork()
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903211752040.2767-100000@zone.syracuse.net>
In-Reply-To: <199903211721.JAA13495@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:

> :Hence the NEW flag RFSTACK. Why would this be a bad thing? This would keep
> :the old behavior and allow much nicer new behavior. I didn't suggest
> :changing the old behavior. This would just greatly simplify things so all of
> 
>     I think Richard Seaman has it right:  the stack needs to be passed.
> 
>     Why don't we simply implement the linux clone()?  It sounds to me that
>     it would be trivial.

Let's add another parameter to fork1/rfork():

pid_t    rfork __P((int, ...));  for userland

struct rfork_args { int flags; caddr_t extra; };

and in the kernel would be:

fork1(p1, flags)
    register struct proc *p1;
    int flags;
    caddr_t extra;
{ foo
}

We, of course, have backward binary and code compatibility outside of the
kernel with the ellipses, and inside the kernel we control it anyway so we
can modify whatever needs to be changed.

> 
> :the assembly wouldn't be needed. Hmm... actually... if one were to mmap() a
> :stack and as soon as the rfork() returned movl newstack,%esp and whatnot,
> :wouldn't this be a pretty simple solution? 
> 
>     No, because one of the processes may overrun the stack before the other
>     one managed to return from rfork().  The child process cannot use the
>     old stack at all.

Why would a simple movl be using the stack?

> 
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<dillon@backplane.com>
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 

 Brian Feldman					  _ __  ___ ___ ___  
 green@unixhelp.org			      _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
	     http://www.freebsd.org/	 _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) |
 FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!	   _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/ 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903211752040.2767-100000>