From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Apr 3 22:44:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from public.bta.net.cn (public.bta.net.cn [202.96.0.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BA637B5B5 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:42:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robinson@netrinsics.com) Received: from netrinsics.com (yy-133-9-a8.bta.net.cn [202.108.133.9]) by public.bta.net.cn (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05131 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:39:42 +0800 (GMT) Received: (from robinson@localhost) by netrinsics.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA65851; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:41:46 +0800 (+0800) (envelope-from robinson) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:41:46 +0800 (+0800) From: Michael Robinson Message-Id: <200004040541.NAA65851@netrinsics.com> To: brennan@offwhite.net, brooks@one-eyed-alien.net Subject: Re: journaling fs Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20000403132828.A28633@orion.ac.hmc.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brooks Davis writes: >Journaling is only one solution to >this problem. Most of the features you will typicaly see attributed to >a JFS have nothing to do with journaling. What most people seem to want >from a JFS is buzzword compliance. What I want most from a JFS is the ability to do reliable backups while running production services, like I can do with Veritas' file system snapshots. -Michael Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message